Reflection on Beacon Lighting Financial Ratio Analysis
Before understanding what accounting really means, my commonsense approach was to look at a firm’s profit and sales in its financials and see if they were increasing year by year. If so, great, right? Well, as I’ve progressed through my studies, I’ve learned that this question isn’t as straightforward as it seems. Accounting is not just about the numbers.
As we begin to analyse our firm’s ratios and what they reveal, I’m genuinely excited to uncover what these numbers truly represent. In previous studies, I’ve used ratios without fully understanding their implications. In Assignment One, I found calculating the ratios fairly straightforward, although Martin pointed out one mistake by using the wrong year for a particular calculation.
Starting with the profitability ratios, I looked at Return on Assets (ROA) and Net profit margin to assess Beacon Lighting’s performance. I noticed that ROA gradually decreased by around 37% over the four years from 2021 to 2024 (from 13% to 8.2%). At first glance, this appears concerning, as ROA measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate after-tax profit.
I also observed a similar decline in Return on Net Operating Assets (RNOA), which dropped by about 43% over the same period. There seems to be a similar connection with both these ratios, although RNOA focuses on returns generated from core operations, and the fact that both ROA and RNOA are declining, signals that Beacon’s operational efficiency is weakening.
Net profit margin also dropped from 13% to 9.3%, indicating shrinking margins. This could be due to rising costs (e.g., inflation, as noted in annual reports) and decreased demand for products, putting pressure on sales. These falling profitability ratios suggest that Beacon Lighting is facing cost pressures and reduced consumer demand. Operational leverage may also be contracting due to rising production costs.
Moving to liquidity, Beacon Lighting’s current ratio improved from 1.4 to 1.68 over the four years, suggesting it should be able to meet short-term obligations without major cash flow concerns. However, this increase was driven largely by a doubling of trade and other receivables, while this may seem positive, it could also indicate that customers are taking longer to pay or that Beacon has loosened its credit terms.
The quick ratio, however, tells a different story. It declined in 2022 and 2023 before recovering in 2024. During this time, inventories increased by 30% (from 2021 to 2022), possibly reflecting slower stock turnover as consumer spending fell. Prepayments also rose during this period, contributing to a quick ratio below 1, which is less than ideal.
Efficiency ratios also declined over the 4 years, with total asset turnover by 12% and current asset turnover by 21%, supporting the view that stock was building up and not moving as quickly. Broader economic conditions likely contributed to this, with reduced consumer spending having a noticeable impact on Beacon Lighting’s performance.
Looking at solvency, the debt-to-equity ratio fell by 24% over the four years, suggesting that Beacon is reducing its reliance on debt and managing financial risk more conservatively. Meanwhile equity ratio on the other hand increased by 19% over the 4 years, which at first sight looks confusing. By calculating the equity divided by assets, it would suggest by increasing, Beacon is not relying on as much debt to finance assets and using more of their own funds.
In terms of market ratios, earnings per share (EPS) fell from $0.17 in 2021 to $0.13 in 2024, reflecting lower net profits and a slight increase in shares issued. Interestingly, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio jumped significantly, by 59% from 2023 to 2024, rising from 11.36 to 18.05. This suggests that investors are willing to pay more per dollar of earnings, possibly because they expect stronger future performance. This view is supported by a share price increase from $1.71 in 2023 to $2.41 in 2024.
Accounting Drivers – Commentary
The key drivers of Beacon Lighting’s economic profit (Abnormal Operating Income, or Abnormal OI) are Return on Net Operating Assets (RNOA), cost of capital, and Net Operating Assets (NOA).
Economic profit is calculated as:
(RNOA – Cost of Capital) × NOA
While economic profit remained positive from 2021 to 2024, it declined from $34,597 to $25,183. This drop appears to be primarily driven by a steady decline in RNOA, especially after 2022. This reflects tighter margins and reduced asset turnover, likely due to increased operating costs as noted in the annual report. While Beacon is still creating value, the downward trend is a concern. . While Beacon is still adding value, it would be a sign of declining economic profit.
As noted earlier, the profit margin declined over the four years. The asset turnover ratio (ATO) also dropped, from 3.43 to 2.55,indicating a decrease in asset efficiency. Together, these two metrics explain the decline in RNOA.
The cost of capital, given to us by Martin, remained constant at 8% throughout the four-year period. This standard Weighted average of Cost of Capital (WACC) assumption highlights, that the decrease in economic profit stems primarily from falling returns, not rising costs of capital.
Net Operating Assets (NOA) increased from $84,434 to $126,880 over the period. Since NOA represents capital invested in operations, this increase suggests Beacon is continuing to invest in growth. Notably, Beacon holds a 50% interest in the Large Format Property Fund, which owns seven retail properties. Four of these properties were fully tenanted throughout 2024, and three properties were development projects. In 2024, the Fund acquired additional land in Bathurst for future development, expanding its footprint further.
Free Cash Flow (FCF), calculated as Operating Income minus the change in NOA, was the most volatile metric across the four years. It started at $21,432 in 2021, dropped to a low of $8,056 in 2023, then rebounded sharply to $42,279 in 2024. This fluctuation reflects the combination of falling operating income (aligned with RNOA and PM) and rising investment in operations, particularly in 2023. The improvement in 2024 likely reflects more disciplined capital investment and better cash flow management.
Despite these declines, the firm is still generating strong positive returns, which is rare and valuable for any firm moving forward

